Effectiveness of SB1608 in Federal Court

CASp, the Certified Access Specialist Program offers a variety of benefits to businesses that get a CASp certification.  The advantages can be further gleamed from the California Chamber of Commerce website [link: Advantages of CASp for businesses].  The main advantages of CASp certification are many (including a 90 day stay and a limit of $4k per effected violation per visit).  Yet because CASp is California law and the ADA is Federal law, many business owners we’ve talked with are concerned about the effectiveness of SB1608. Business owners concerned about Federal Court sGuits often ask:

“Is CASp worth getting?”

A recent court case provides a real life example of this issue.  A business which had CASp certification was sued in Federal Court.  Now, Federal judges do not have to honor the California law, for instance, they do not have to  grant the 90 day stay.  This judge chose not to.

So, is CASp worth it?

Keep in mind that the differences between Federal and State court for ADA lawsuits are many.  We can’t go over these things exhaustively but we will outline the general principles at this current time.  Keep in mind that your case is unique and if you are under a lawsuit you must consult an attorney, don’t rely on this post for advice — this article is covering a topic.  We are not giving legal advice.

If you are sued in Federal Court, you have the possibility of fixing the issue in question in order to make the lawsuit go away.  Also, if you offer to settle and the plaintiff attorney refuses the settlement and you fix the issue, you may not have to pay for their attorneys fees (the judge may waive those damages).

In California Court, you fixing the issue in question doesn’t make the issue go away.  Violations valid at the time of the encounter remain violations for which damages under the Unruh Act automatically entitle the plaintiff party $4k.  Furthermore, the Unruh Act also specifies that attorneys fees will be paid.

So while CASp can’t provide coverage into areas of Federal law, it does provide some stronger incentives for plaintiffs to sue a CASp business under Federal Court.  If the plaintiff takes you to California court, CASp goes into effect, and you can go straight to arbitration.  However, they take you to Federal Court, you may still get arbitration… if you don’t, your fighting chances are better — you can STILL fix the issue in question and win the suit that way… an option we are told, is not available in California Court.

So overall, in answering the question above, the answer is:

YES!

Without CASp, a savvy plaintiff will take you to California Court, in which you will pay the same $4k plus attorney’s fees (potentially tens of thousands of dollars). With CASp you either pay $4k at most, or you can go to Federal court and have a chance at making the issue go away. Get CASp now to cover yourself!

Any questions or concerns?  Call us at 866 982 3212 or email us at help@accesssolutionllc.com.

244 Replies to “Effectiveness of SB1608 in Federal Court”

  1. Pingback: System Requirments
  2. Pingback: 카지노사이트
  3. Pingback: 온라인바카라
  4. Pingback: 토토사이트
  5. Pingback: Michael Lutz
  6. Pingback: warnetqq
  7. Pingback: Kingpen Vape
  8. Pingback: THC Vape Oil
  9. Pingback: ts2 space
  10. Pingback: THC Oil
  11. Pingback: seo prutser
  12. Pingback: my site
  13. Pingback: click this site
  14. Pingback: 바카라
  15. Pingback: used cars manitoba
  16. Pingback: 안전바카라
  17. Pingback: 먹튀검증
  18. Pingback: windows vpn
  19. Pingback: CBD Spray
  20. Pingback: mega poker99
  21. Pingback: GLOCK 17M – 9MM
  22. Pingback: CBD pet treat
  23. Pingback: lo de online
  24. Pingback: here site
  25. Pingback: 토토 가족방
  26. Pingback: original webbplats
  27. Pingback: go to link
  28. Pingback: pharmacy prices
  29. Pingback: Vastarel
  30. Pingback: viagra
  31. Pingback: buy cialis paypal
  32. Pingback: jqvglued
  33. Pingback: cialis
  34. Pingback: write my essay
  35. Pingback: furosemide 45 mg
  36. Pingback: ivermectin 24 mg
  37. Pingback: prednisolone mg
  38. Pingback: diflucan cvs
  39. Pingback: buying an essay
  40. Pingback: thesis consulting
  41. Pingback: paxil and sleep
  42. Pingback: plaquenil icd 10
  43. Pingback: reddit viagra
  44. Pingback: eli lilly cialis
  45. Pingback: cialis pills
  46. Pingback: cialis 20mg daily
  47. Pingback: cialis medication
  48. Pingback: viagra
  49. Pingback: viagra otc
  50. Pingback: cialis orange pill
  51. Pingback: cialis 5 mg
  52. Pingback: quit lexapro
  53. Pingback: cialis usa
  54. Pingback: edegra priligy
  55. Pingback: cheap cialis 40 mg
  56. Pingback: buy viagra
  57. Pingback: buy real viagra
  58. Pingback: iverm 6 mg
  59. Pingback: cialis daily use
  60. Pingback: cialis website
  61. Pingback: viagra para mujer
  62. Pingback: viagra en ligne
  63. Pingback: viagra users group
  64. Pingback: viagra prices
  65. Pingback: amoxicillin 500mg
  66. Pingback: furosemide 3170
  67. Pingback: neurontin generic
  68. Pingback: plaquenil 400 mg
  69. Pingback: avana 100 price
  70. Pingback: ivermectin canada
  71. Pingback: cvs viagra
  72. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine
  73. Pingback: dapoxetine online
  74. Pingback: albuterol capsules
  75. Pingback: azithromycin buy
  76. Pingback: viagra boys
  77. Pingback: roman viagra
  78. Pingback: viagra for women
  79. Pingback: sex games captions
  80. Pingback: sildenafil price
  81. Pingback: generic for viagra
  82. Pingback: natural viagra
  83. Pingback: viagra pills
  84. Pingback: viagra porn
  85. Pingback: coffee viagra
  86. Pingback: aralen eye
  87. Pingback: bimatoprost sr
  88. Pingback: tizanidine 5mg
  89. Pingback: nolvadex tabs
  90. Pingback: 25mg clomid tabs
  91. Pingback: baricitinib fda
  92. Pingback: ivermectin 0.5%
  93. Pingback: bahis siteleri
  94. Pingback: 1dorchester
  95. Pingback: pornoizle}
  96. Pingback: A片

Leave a Reply