Conflicts Between Federal and State Laws on Disabled Access in 2011

Starting the new year (2011) on the right foot is a great way to help set the tone for the new year.

So we at YTA have decided that the best way to do that is to help all you out there notice a few of the conflicts between State and Federal Law. The state in question, of course, is California.

Between the updated 2010 Federal requirements of disabled access under the ADA for all businesses serving the public and the updated 2010 California Building Code (CBC) there are a variety of common conflicts business owners should be aware of.  Some of the common conflicts include:

  1. While the CBC never allows a maximum slope of over 8.33% (1:12) the ADA has allowances for steeper slopes if the slope rises less than 3 inches the maximum slope is 12.5% (1:8).  If the rise is 6 inches the maximum slope lowers to 10% (1:10).
  2. Ramps runs under the CBC can only rise to a maximum of 30 inches per run but as the length of the ramp run increases, the maximum slope decreases.  E.g., a ramp run that is 465 inches long cannot have a slope greater than 6.67% (1:15).
  3. The ADA always requires a clear floor space of 18 inches square directly under each door sign whereas the CBC only requires clear floor space based on the latch side clearances for each door.
  4. The CBC requires that employee parking include parking spaces reserved for the disabled.  For the CBC, the total ratio of disabled parking spaces must include employee spaces.  The Advisory for the ADA states that employee parking lots are not required to be included in the required ratio of disabled parking.
  5. The ADA allows the door closer to swing into the head clearance down to 78 inches.  The CBC does not allow the door closer to drop less than 80 inches.
  6. While both the ADA and the CBC now have requirements for a maximum mirror height of 35 inches for mirrors not over sinks in restrooms, the ADA advisory states that the top edge of stand alone mirrors should be no less than 74 inches above the finished floor.
  7. The CBC requires that disabled parking spaces reserved for vans should always have the access aisle on the passenger side (when the van is pulling forward).  The ADA allows the access aisle to be on either side of the space except when the parking space is angled.  Angled van parking spaces are required to have the access aisle on the passenger side.
  8. Parking space signs for the CBC must be at least 80 inches above the parking grade when in the path of travel.  ADA parking signs must always be at least 60 inches above the parking grade.
  9. For the ADA, grab bars in restrooms can be anywhere from 33 to 36 inches measured to the top above the finish floor.  In the CBC must be exactly 33 inches on center above the finished floor, unless you are using a tank toilet and the rear bar interferes with the tank’s lid.  If that’s the case then the CBC allows the rear bar to be anywhere from 33 to 36 inches on center.

These are just some of the conflicts between the CBC and the ADA.  Negotiating these code requirements requires intimate knowledge about both the INTENT of the law and the explicit details surrounding the requirements.  Hiring an experienced Access Consultant is a must!  Should you have any questions, please email Yours Truly Accessibility Corporation at  help@accesssolutionllc.com or call us 866-982-3212 x 1.

136 Replies to “Conflicts Between Federal and State Laws on Disabled Access in 2011”

  1. Pingback: 바카라
  2. Pingback: Human Resources
  3. Pingback: sen bir oğlansın
  4. Pingback: Mazlo
  5. Pingback: 카지노사이트
  6. Pingback: Tochka Market
  7. Pingback: lapak qq
  8. Pingback: raja capsa
  9. Pingback: click here now
  10. Pingback: i99casino
  11. Pingback: the sims 4
  12. Pingback: 카지노사이트
  13. Pingback: replica tag watch
  14. Pingback: cdrqq
  15. Pingback: 카지노사이트
  16. Pingback: porn
  17. Pingback: 사설토토
  18. Pingback: dentistry
  19. Pingback: satta king
  20. Pingback: abnclassifieds.com
  21. Pingback: Dispensary Loans
  22. Pingback: qq online
  23. Pingback: vn 88
  24. Pingback: juul pods flavors
  25. Pingback: Kingpen
  26. Pingback: Stiiizy
  27. Pingback: Glock 17
  28. Pingback: THC Oil
  29. Pingback: nnbygsnd
  30. Pingback: cialis tablets
  31. Pingback: viagra
  32. Pingback: essay writing help
  33. Pingback: amoxicillin price
  34. Pingback: furosemide 45 mg
  35. Pingback: ventolin 200
  36. Pingback: prednisolone 2 mg
  37. Pingback: clomid hormone
  38. Pingback: synthroid insomnia
  39. Pingback: is metformin bad
  40. Pingback: medications paxil
  41. Pingback: tadalafil for sale
  42. Pingback: 40 pills viagra
  43. Pingback: xenical prices
  44. Pingback: internet dating
  45. Pingback: Keto diet
  46. Pingback: order amoxicillin
  47. Pingback: lasix 60
  48. Pingback: gabapentin cost
  49. Pingback: plaquenil for sale
  50. Pingback: prednisone 5
  51. Pingback: modafinil xl
  52. Pingback: stromectol nz
  53. Pingback: 4mg albuterol
  54. Pingback: lasix 20
  55. Pingback: avana 50 mg
  56. Pingback: clomid price uk
  57. Pingback: aralen pill
  58. Pingback: new covid drug
  59. Pingback: 1 mg tizanidine
  60. Pingback: nolvadex india
  61. Pingback: olumiant price

Leave a Reply